A Summary on National Status
Based on conversations from the Radio Ranch show with Roger Sayles, April 1, 2025
To help you understand the concepts surrounding the national status, let me start with a question.
Would you like to be free?
The concept of national status is unbelievably simple. When you see how simple this is, you’ll be shocked because it seems so complex. They’ve made it complex so that we can’t figure it out. When it all boils down, it’s really simple. Do you remember the Jim Crow laws? You’ve heard about them, haven’t you?
Well, here is what really happened. Of course, after the Civil War there were many former Black slaves in the South. The 13th Amendment, the 14th Amendment and The Jim Crow law wasn’t exclusively written for them, but their former condition of slavery has been framed as the reason for the amendment and the law, as well as the reason for the Civil War itself . It is contended that the actual reason for the Civil War was to enact the 13th and 14th Amendment. It’s apparent that former black slaves were certainly predominantly the ones affected at the time, but it was also the people in DC and the territories before the Civil War who were also stateless. They didn’t have any kind of state jurisdictional affiliation. There was also no federal government to oversee them and give them rights and privileges. In fact, there were only state citizens for the first ninety years of the country. After the Civil War and the passing of the 13th & 14th Amendment and the Jim Crow laws came into effect, the former black slaves and those people that lived in D.C. and the territories now had citizenship. Albeit U.S. federal citizenship rather than state citizenship. Note that the 13th Amendment was actually focused on the state citizens because there were no federal U.S. citizens at the time of enacting the 13th Amendment. But take heart, just because the 14th Amendment created the federal U.S. citizenship, the state citizenship did not go away, it just took a back seat to the federal U.S. citizenship.
But you see, the Jim Crow laws were not a black and white issue. They were certainly personified as such. Almost everything everybody has ever read or been taught about the Civil War or anything else will say that it was. But the Jim Crow laws were really a political statement because the people in the states associated with the Jim Crow laws were the state citizens who still had God-given rights, owed God their duties, and had total constitutional protections. Based on the racial mix of the country at the time before the Civil War, the state citizens were, for the most part, white. The new federal citizens, created by the 14th Amendment, were mainly black former slaves who gained civil rights under the 14th Amendment. This inherent racial discrepancy between the original 14th Amendment citizen and the historical state citizen created the basic thought that the Civil War was specifically about eliminating slavery and was specifically about race. In reality, it was to establish a new federal citizenship that was designed to entrap the former Black slaves into another form of slavery and eventually entrap all Americans into this slavery in the future.
The 14th Amendment gave former black slaves, as well as those in D.C. and the territories, lowercase civil rights from the government, and they owe the federal government their duty. That’s where they got their personhood. So, that’s what the Jim Crow law and the 14th Amendment was about. Really, it was a political difference, not a color difference. Simultaneously, underneath the 14th Amendment’s federal citizenship was the feudal system. Just remember, the people behind the creation of the new federal citizenship, even today, don’t think like we do. This is how they think: “We want to enslave all the people. So, what we’ll do is we’ll take the black man and put him in a halfway position where he thinks he’s free, but underneath it, that position is the feudal system.”
Their intention was to eventually trick everyone into a condition of servitude through 14th amendment citizenship, and that’s exactly what they did. On March 9th, 1933, during the government bankruptcy, they also managed to make the entire population, who were federal, fourteenth amendment citizens, sureties for this bankruptcy. It was essentially a bond bankruptcy. They used the 14th amendment citizen as collateral for the debt, leveraging their future productivity. Underneath it all lies a feudal system where they have property rights in these federal citizens. They simply took them all and made them sureties for the debt. Essentially, the newly created birth certificates were used as warehouse receipts. The birth certificate represents the status, but is not the reason for it. The birth certificate is monetized and attached to federal bonds for trading in the bond market. In effect, the monetized birth certificates of the federal, 14th Amendment, U.S. citizens forms the foundation of our current monetary system that utilizes legal tender or debt notes for commerce. So that’s what happened in 1933 and this process has continued to this day.
Are you a citizen, are you a resident?
The concepts of the feudal system and it’s associated voluntary servitude affect us today because it can be extrapolated from the 13th Amendment, which does not mention voluntary servitude and thus is legal by omission. Accepting the 14th Amendment servitude has to be voluntary, except at birth, where it is presumed until an individual voluntarily accepts it when they eventually will answer yes to the two questions: Are you a citizen, and are you a resident?
There are actually two places in the Constitution where voluntary servitude is totally 100% lawful and legal, and that is what they’re using here. So, in the feudal system, which you didn’t know you were in, people in voluntary servitude have allegiance to the lord of the manor, or in the situation of a 14th Amendment citizen, the U.S. federal government is the lord of the manor and has a property right in you. Subsequently, when two 14th Amendment federal citizens have children and are under the servitude of the U.S. federal government via the feudal systems, their children are born into this same condition.
The 13th and 14th Amendments initiated this process in the late 19th century and it has been passed down through generations in earnest since 1933. Although first born into this servitude without their permission, children grow up and voluntarily agree to and confirm their servitude to the lord of the manor, the U.S. federal government, every time they answer in the affirmative to the two questions asked: “Are you a citizen of the United States?” and “Are you a resident?”
Individuals were put into the condition of servitude at birth without their permission. It was due in part to the discretion and pre-condition of servitude of their parents based on the auspices of the 14th Amendment. Considering this, being born into this condition per the 14th Amendment without your permission could be considered involuntary servitude, which is outlawed by the 13th Amendment and thus, based on fraud.
Here is the exciting part of this!
Because it was fraud and was confirmed voluntarily, this condition of servitude can be rebutted.
An individual can easily remove themselves from this condition with a simple affidavit to the U.S. Secretary of State. If getting into this condition is initially based on fraud and then is voluntarily affirmed, then individuals can remove themselves voluntarily. If the federal government prevents an individual from voluntarily removing oneself from doing so, it is tyranny. All it takes is a one-page, 2-sentence affidavit to the U.S. Secretary of State to take back your true freedom, not the perceived freedom of U.S. citizenship. This affidavit will annul any contract associated with your connection or any presumed connection to U.S. citizenship. It negates any previous voluntary agreement you have made regarding affirming and agreeing to the questions of “Are you citizen of the United States? Are you a resident?”. The affidavit eliminates the presumption that you’re a federal U.S. citizen and declares your status as a “national” from that time onward.
To summarize, it may be difficult and require a change in mindset to understand that U.S. citizenship is different from American citizenship. U.S. citizenship is seen as a form of servitude based on the concept of feudalism.
Also, we have been conditioned to believe that U.S. citizenship is the ultimate form of patriotism. However, I argue that American citizenship (national status) is the highest level of patriotism. A “national” is not obligated to adhere to licenses, permits, or permissions and is governed by God’s laws, not man-made privileges.