WELCOME TO OUR FORUMS!
Log In or Register to ask questions, get notified when others respond, and find answers from your fellow freedom seekers!
Be sure to Subscribe to the New Topics and Posts so that you will get the notifications. To keep the forum healthy, objective, and functional, please remember our Rules of Conduct:
- No abusive or slanderous language is allowed.
- Professional conduct and communication is expected of you.
- No sharing offensive or inappropriate material.
- No spamming.
RoE document

Quote from jgarland on December 23, 2023, 9:57 amHighly suggest updates to the template RoE document that you have on the site.
Wording, at least based upon the teachings of Roger Sayles are wrong and outdated UCC codes are being used which invalidates their intended application within the document.
I can provide more depth if you wish to speak further.
Highly suggest updates to the template RoE document that you have on the site.
Wording, at least based upon the teachings of Roger Sayles are wrong and outdated UCC codes are being used which invalidates their intended application within the document.
I can provide more depth if you wish to speak further.

Quote from David on December 23, 2023, 4:09 pmThank you jgarland!
I appreciate your information about the ROE.
I know Roger has suggested going to WeissParis for their ROE. I believe this is where it originally came from but was provided through the group on Roger's show and I believe it was also discussed in one of Joe L's videos. Not sure, but there may be varying versions floating around. Do you have a vetted version with updated and current codes, etc. If so, would you mind sharing and I can update the example in the IRS section of The Remedy area of the site. My email is: david@nationalstatus.info. Thanks again for your input and information. We're getting this site up and going. We're really excited about its future and its potential to help folks become truly free.
David
Admin - NationalStatus.info
Thank you jgarland!
I appreciate your information about the ROE.
I know Roger has suggested going to WeissParis for their ROE. I believe this is where it originally came from but was provided through the group on Roger's show and I believe it was also discussed in one of Joe L's videos. Not sure, but there may be varying versions floating around. Do you have a vetted version with updated and current codes, etc. If so, would you mind sharing and I can update the example in the IRS section of The Remedy area of the site. My email is: david@nationalstatus.info. Thanks again for your input and information. We're getting this site up and going. We're really excited about its future and its potential to help folks become truly free.
David
Admin - NationalStatus.info

Quote from Qoztek on April 1, 2025, 7:36 pmIs it possible to submit an RoE that is more concise, without the justifications? We would be assuming that the person reading it is familiar with the codes and case law and all that. Is all that necessary to make it binding?
Is it possible to submit an RoE that is more concise, without the justifications? We would be assuming that the person reading it is familiar with the codes and case law and all that. Is all that necessary to make it binding?

Quote from Admin on April 1, 2025, 8:09 pmThat is the only version we have, and it's the one we used. But Mark may have a version that is only one page. You can contact him at strawman@markallcaps.com.
That is the only version we have, and it's the one we used. But Mark may have a version that is only one page. You can contact him at strawman@markallcaps.com.

Quote from Qoztek on April 3, 2025, 11:49 amThank you. Email is sent.
For reference, this is what I have in mind:
Revocation of Election
I, _____________, a national, being duly sworn, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States, who by a prior sub silentio government act made an 'election' to have my earnings treated or taxed like that of a Resident of the District of Columbia or one employed directly by the federal government, hereby exercise the option to lawfully terminate and revoke the prior election via the statutory process of Revocation of Election, as alluded to in 26 USC §6013(g)(4)(A).
I am no longer identified as a Taxpayer or liable to federal taxation under current laws, being neither of the subject nor of the object of federal revenue laws, unless I physically reside in the District of Columbia or am employed directly by the federal government, and I can never again make a similar sub silentio 'election' in the future.
(Signature lines similar to Affidavit)
Thank you. Email is sent.
For reference, this is what I have in mind:
Revocation of Election
I, _____________, a national, being duly sworn, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States, who by a prior sub silentio government act made an 'election' to have my earnings treated or taxed like that of a Resident of the District of Columbia or one employed directly by the federal government, hereby exercise the option to lawfully terminate and revoke the prior election via the statutory process of Revocation of Election, as alluded to in 26 USC §6013(g)(4)(A).
I am no longer identified as a Taxpayer or liable to federal taxation under current laws, being neither of the subject nor of the object of federal revenue laws, unless I physically reside in the District of Columbia or am employed directly by the federal government, and I can never again make a similar sub silentio 'election' in the future.
(Signature lines similar to Affidavit)

Quote from Admin on April 3, 2025, 2:14 pmI believe I would talk to Mark before using new documents. We only recommend documents that have been used, and we know they will work. Just my 2 cents. 🙂
I believe I would talk to Mark before using new documents. We only recommend documents that have been used, and we know they will work. Just my 2 cents. 🙂