WELCOME TO OUR FORUMS!
Log In or Register to ask questions, get notified when others respond, find answers from your fellow Freedom Seekers!
Be sure to Subscribe to the New Topics and Posts so that you will get the notifications. To keep the forum healthy, objective, and functional, please remember our Rules of Conduct:
- No abusive or slanderous language is allowed.
- Professional conduct and communication is expected of you.
- No sharing offensive or inappropriate material.
- No spamming.
The anti government handbook
Doing some afternoon research and found this document. Quite a catchy title. Has some interesting history from the governments prospective.
I am currently about 20 pages in. I think overall it speaks to the concerns and worries of corrupt government bodies.
I am sure this is required reading for judges and Prosecutors in Missouri 2nd most JURISDICTIONALLY corrupted county. Clay County Missouri.
it seems in what i have read sofar the document fails to convey that we the people are the government and at anytime we can replace a corrupt government.
Anyway a interesting read nevertheless.
https://famguardian.org/Publications/AntiGovernmentMvmt/anti-govt_handbook.htm
Doing some afternoon research and found this document. Quite a catchy title. Has some interesting history from the governments prospective.
I am currently about 20 pages in. I think overall it speaks to the concerns and worries of corrupt government bodies.
I am sure this is required reading for judges and Prosecutors in Missouri 2nd most JURISDICTIONALLY corrupted county. Clay County Missouri.
it seems in what i have read sofar the document fails to convey that we the people are the government and at anytime we can replace a corrupt government.
Anyway a interesting read nevertheless.
Admin, David and George have reacted to this post.
Quote from
Admin on August 31, 2024, 5:10 pm
Very interesting, will have to check it out. Maybe we should share it on the site.
Very interesting, will have to check it out. Maybe we should share it on the site.
David, George and Jon In Missouri have reacted to this post.
DavidGeorgeJon In Missouri
National Status Admin
admin@nationalstatus.info
Quote from
Admin on August 31, 2024, 5:10 pm
Very interesting, will have to check it out. Maybe we should share it on the site.
It would be a honor to have contributed to your outstanding website.
Quote from
Admin on August 31, 2024, 5:10 pm
Very interesting, will have to check it out. Maybe we should share it on the site.
It would be a honor to have contributed to your outstanding website.
Admin and George have reacted to this post.
Looks like the fbi and southern poverty law center are up to thier bs. Found this article and was shocked how it smells of jewerys minds. See for yourself. Disgusting.
https://www.police1.com/sovereign-citizens/american-state-nationals-the-newest-group-of-sovereign-citizens
Looks like the fbi and southern poverty law center are up to thier bs. Found this article and was shocked how it smells of jewerys minds. See for yourself. Disgusting.
Understanding the behavior and ideology of sovereign citizens is crucial for ensuring the safety of law enforcement officers, especially during traffic stops
Admin, David and George have reacted to this post.
Quote from
David on November 23, 2024, 9:30 am
Yes, it is disgusting. They wrap nationals in the BS of the "sovereign citizen" crap. The average "Joe" and most law enforcement do not understand the "national" status. When discussing this topic correctly, it is best to use the simple, statutory term of "national." There is no mention of "national" in the article. What's also interesting in this article is the use of the term "American State National," which is also a non-statutory term made up by so-called pay-triots.
So, in summary, when readers of this article hear the term "national," they assume it is synonomous with a sovereign citizen or an American state national. The sovereign citizen title is merely a made-up, non-statutory term designed to create a negative connotation of patriotic American.
I actually emailed the author to explain what a national is and shared a link to this website. And of course I never got a response.
Yes, it is disgusting. They wrap nationals in the BS of the "sovereign citizen" crap. The average "Joe" and most law enforcement do not understand the "national" status. When discussing this topic correctly, it is best to use the simple, statutory term of "national." There is no mention of "national" in the article. What's also interesting in this article is the use of the term "American State National," which is also a non-statutory term made up by so-called pay-triots.
So, in summary, when readers of this article hear the term "national," they assume it is synonomous with a sovereign citizen or an American state national. The sovereign citizen title is merely a made-up, non-statutory term designed to create a negative connotation of patriotic American.
I actually emailed the author to explain what a national is and shared a link to this website. And of course I never got a response.
Admin and George have reacted to this post.
Quote from
George on November 23, 2024, 10:21 am
Yeah, I saw that article too. Those writers don't dig very deep. Just mockingbirds, not real journalists.
Yeah, I saw that article too. Those writers don't dig very deep. Just mockingbirds, not real journalists.
Admin has reacted to this post.
